PROVE IT WRONG OR PASS IT ON

PROVE IT WRONG OR PASS IT ON BannerFans.com

BE THIS GUY

BE THIS GUY
August Landmesser, Hamburg Shipyard Worker Who Refused To Make Nazi Salute

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

WikiLeaks, Revolution, and the Lost Cojones of American Journalism


Naomi Wolf Posted: February 4, 2011 11:40 AM

Now that the WikiLeaks releases about Tunisian corruption have directly sparked a peoples' uprising in Tunisia; now that Egypt is in the throes of pro-democracy protest driven in large measure by WikiLeaks' revelation in the Palestine Papers about US manipulation of Palestine, surely one would expect key U.S. news organizations and journalists to rally prominently to the defense of the right to publish that that site represents. One would expect lead editorials supporting Assange's right to publish from the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and USAToday, not to mention every major TV outlet. But instead, what we have heard is the deafening sounds of what middle-schoolers call 'crickets' -- that is, an awkward silence. As Nancy Youssef in the McClatchy papers reported recently, most U.S. journalists -- and, even more shamefully, journalists' organizations -- decided, regarding supporting Wikileaks' freedom to publish, to "take a pass."
How on earth could this be? This cravenness represents one of American journalism's darkest hours -- as dark as the depth of the McCarthy era. In terms of the question of the legalities of publishing classified information, most American journalists understand full well that Assange is not the one who committed the crime of illegally obtaining classified material -- that was Bradley Manning, or whomever released the material to the site. So Assange is not the 'hacker' of secrets, as People magazine has mis-identified him; he is of course the publisher, just as any traditional news organization is. He is not Daniel Ellsberg, in the most comparable analogy, the illegal releaser of the classified Pentagon Papers; rather, Assange is analogous to the New York Times, which made the brave and correct decision to publish the Pentagon Papers in the public's interest.
U.S. journalists also know perfectly well that they too traffic in classified material continually -- and many of our most prominent reporters have built lucrative careers doing exactly what Assange is being charged with. Any sophisticated dinner party in media circles in New York or Washington has journalists jauntily showing prospective employers their goods, or trading favors with each other, by disclosing classified information. For we all, in this profession, know that seeking out and handling classified information is what serious journalists DO: their job is to find out the government's secrets in spite of officials who don't want these secrets revealed. American journalists also know that the U.S. government classifies information mostly out of embarrassment, or for expediency, rather than because of true national security concerns (an example is the classification of suspicious deaths in Guantanamo and other US-held jails). The New York Times garnered kudos -- as they should have -- in 2005 with the publication of the SWIFT banking story -- based on leaked classified documents, which makes Bill Kellers' recent essay trying to put distance between his newspaper and WikiLeaks all the more indefensible.
Here is what readers are not being told: We have ALL handled classified information if we are serious American journalists. I am waiting for more than a handful of other American reporters, editors and news organizations to have the courage -- courage that is in abundance in Tahrir Square and on the pages of Al Jazeera, now that we no longer see it on the editorial page of the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal -- to stand up and confirm the obvious. For the assault on Assange to be credible, they would have to come arrest us all. Many of Bob Woodward's bestselling books, which have made him America's highest-paid reporter, are based on classified information -- that's why he gets the big bucks. Where are the calls for Woodward's arrest? Indeed Dick Cheney and other highest-level officials in the Bush administration committed the same act as Bradley Manning in this case, when they illegally revealed the classified identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame.
So why do all these American reporters, who know quite well that they get praise and money for doing what Assange has done, stand in a silence that can only be called cowardly, while a fellow publisher faces threats of extradition, banning, prosecution for spying -- which can incur the death penalty -- and calls for his assassination?
One could say that the reason for the silence has to do with the sexual misconduct charges in Sweden. But any serious journalist in America knows perfectly well that the two issues must not be conflated. The First Amendment applies to rogues and scoundrels. You don't lose your First Amendment rights because of a sleazy personality, or even for having committed a crime. Felons in jail are protected by the First Amendment. Indeed the most famous First Amendment cases, the ones that are supposed to showcase America's strength and moral power, involve the protection of speech most decent people hate.
So again: why have U.S. journalists and editor, as Youssef reported, "shunned" Assange? Youssef reports an almost unbelievably craven American press scenario: The "freedom of the press committee" -- yes, you read that correctly -- of the Overseas Press Club of America in New York City declared him "not one of us." The Associated Press itself won't issue comment about him. And even the National Press Club in Washington made the decision not to speak publicly about the possibility that Assange may be charged with a crime. She notes that it is foreign press organizations that have had to defend him.
One answer for this silence has to do with what happens to the press in a closing society. I warned in 2006 and often since that you don't need a coup to close down America's open society -- you need to simply accomplish a few key goals. One critical task -- number seven -- is to intimidate journalists; this is done, as in any closing society, by creating a situation in which a high-profile reporter is accused of "treason" or of endangering national security through their reporting, and threatened with torture or with a show trial and indefinite detention. History shows that when that happens, you don't need to arrest or threaten any other reporters -- because they immediately start to police and censor themselves, and fall all over themselves attacking the "traitor" as well. That way safety lies, whether the knowledge is conscious or not.
Another motive is revealed in the comment that Assange is "not one of us." U.S. journalism's business model is collapsing; the people who should be out in front defending Assange are facing cut salaries or unemployment because of the medium that Assange represents. These journalists are not willing to concede that Assange is, of course, a publisher, rather than some sort of hybrid terrorist blogger, because of their self-interested prejudices against a medium in which they are not the gatekeepers.
In this, paradoxically, they have become just like the outraged U.S. government officials who are threatening Assange: the American government too is in the position, because of the Internet, of no longer being able to control its secrets, and is lashing out at Assange as it faces a future in which there are no traditional gatekeepers, and all institutions live in glass houses.
It is for this reason that the prosecution of Assange -- and his betrayal by his fellow journalists and publishers in America -- is so almost absurdly futile. Even if they lock Assange up forever, the world of the future is a WikiLeaks world. Trying to extradite and to convict Assange is like trying to convict the first person who dared to install a telephone. The WikiLeaks necessity -- for citizens who are upset at government or private sector abuses of power -- to release documents, is not going away, ever. Egypt is showing us that conclusively: they turn off the news and people create the news on their cellphones. The technology of leaking government secrets globally is not going away either. In five years one can expect that every major institution will have its own version of WikiLeaks -- so shareholders, members of university communities, citizens of governments all over the world, and so on, can read the secrets that are in the public interest that the traditional gatekeepers wish to keep under wraps.
History shows that journalists only protect themselves, when bullied like this, by fighting back -- as a group. And history shows that when a technology and its social change are inevitable, it is better to integrate the way the future will work, into an open society -- rather than trying pointlessly to punish it, in this case by seeking to ship the inevitable future off to Guantanamo Bay.

No comments:

ALL TIME - Most Popular Posts

Secrets Hidden In Plain Sight

Theory of EVERYTHING: GOD, Devils, Dimensions, Dragons, Illusion & Reali...

Loading...

A Lamp In The Dark - Enter The Jesuits

USE YOUR HEAD & OPEN YOUR EYES

USE YOUR HEAD & OPEN YOUR EYES
This is the truth...

Julian Assange

Julian Assange
"Courage is Contagious."

Milton William Cooper PREDICTED 9/11

Milton William  Cooper PREDICTED 9/11
CLICK PHOTO FOR MORE: Milton William Cooper. Naval Intelligence Officer, UFO believer and conspiracy intel expert. Shot and killed in the 3rd attempt on his life. He had only one leg from an earlier attempt. His life was conveniently taken less than a month after September 11th, 2001 after he predicted it and Osama Bin-Laden as the scapegoat. Bill Clinton called him "the most dangerous man on radio". His book "Behold a Pale Horse" proves he was on to something that got him murdered. He was a true American patriot and spoke truths of things he could prove, not rumors that he heard. His research is a valuable beginning to understanding that everything you have been taught is a lie, what you thought you knew, you don't know anything about.

It just takes one...

It just takes one...
ONE MAN WITH COURAGE IS A MAJORITY

Quotes:

"Do not fear your enemies, The worst they can do is kill you. Do not fear your friends, At worst, they may betray you. Fear those who do not care, They neither kill nor betray, but betrayal and murder exists because of their silent consent"

-Bruno Jasienski


If you're not confused, you're not paying attention.


-
Tom Peters



Good character is more to be praised than outstanding talent. Most talents are, to some extent, a gift. Good character, by contrast, is not given to us. We have to build it, piece by piece -- by thought, choice, courage, and determination.

-
H. Jackson Brown


This I believe: That the free, exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world. And this I would fight for: the freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected. And this I must fight against: any idea, religion, or government which limits or destroys the individual.

-
John Steinbeck

‎"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase temporary safety, deserve neither liberty or safety."

-Benjamin Franklin



Character is like a tree and reputation like a shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

-
Abraham Lincoln

"I don't want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers."
- John D. Rockefeller, (1839-1937)


One who asks a question is a fool for five minutes; one who does not ask a question remains a fool forever.

- Chinese Proverb

Thanks for taking the time to read this.

Prove it wrong or pass it on..., DO SOMETHING.


IF VOTING REALLY CHANGED ANYTHING, IT WOULD ALREADY BE ILLEGAL.


“Most charities are public relations for the rich, a scam on the middle class, and a disservice to the poor.”

--NL

Put not your trust in the donkey or the elephant, but in the Lamb.

O-bamanation - WE ARE BUILDING A RELIGION

O-bamanation - WE ARE BUILDING A RELIGION
"Out of MANY, we are ONE." Is this the new "Messiah"? People are comparing Barack Obama to Jesus Christ

George Orwell's warning to us in 1984 coming true.

George Orwell's warning to us in 1984 coming true.
"One Nation, Under a New Obama Salute"

CLICK PICTURE FOR EYE OPENING VIDEO

CLICK PICTURE FOR EYE OPENING VIDEO
WE ARE BUILDING A RELIGION

9/11 Ripple Effect

SHEEP TASTE LIKE CHICKEN

SHEEP TASTE LIKE CHICKEN
Visit Search For Truth's TOP CONSPIRACY SITES

The NEVER ENDING War on Terrorism

The NEVER ENDING War on Terrorism
This means NEVER-ENDING FUNDING and ENDLESS ways to take your rights away from you, dissolve the U.S. Constitution and pillage other nations.

Federal Reserve Bandits

Federal Reserve Bandits

Herbert W. Armstrong

Herbert W. Armstrong
A Voice Crying Out in the Wilderness. Mr. Armstrong - Pioneer for the 20th Century Church of God, he began the modern day true teachings of Christ and spread the true Gospel, the same one Jesus taught- that of a World Tomorrow. He taught peace, love and a better way to live. His early revival of God's message, the true Sabbath, the annual Holy Days and the pagan teachings of Christianity in Christmas, Easter...etc., gave those preaching the Word of Jesus today a guideline for the Bible and the prophecies of troubling times ahead.

Think your vote counts? You're not paying attention!

Sir, YOU ARE A LIAR!

Welcome to a NEW WORLD ORDER.

You Ready For This?

Julian Assange interview - 60 Minutes

Esoteric Agenda (FULL LENGTH)

Comprehensive Look into the Myths Surrounding the Events of 9/11

From Evolutionist to Creationist - Walter Veith

From Evolutionist to Creationist - Walter Veith
This is the testimony of Walter Veith, a South African Professor of Biology. Walter Veith did not grow up as a Christian, but through a number of amazing encounters, he came to a knowledge of the reality of God, and how wonderful He is.

Hungry In America

Hungry In America
Hungry Children in America Bringing attention to the children living in poverty that go hungry in America. Encouraging charity — your support through the many choices available — such as making a donation, volunteerism, or sponsorship of a child in the US. Today, please help a child that is Hungry In America.

Banksy

Banksy

Enjoy the simplicity

Enjoy the simplicity
...OF THE TRUTH

Gas Prices Daily

The past present and future of America...and the world.

"Our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we can not submit. I have ever thought religion a concern, purely between our God and our consciences, for which we were accountable to him and not to the priests. For it is in our lives and not from our words that our religion must be read. But this does not satisfy the priesthood. They must have a positive, a declared ascent to all their interested absurdities. My opinion is that there would never have been an infedel, if there had never been a priest."

-
Thomas Jefferson

Fascism in American Political Culture

Fascism in American Political Culture
Notice the two Fasci under each arm of President Lincoln. These Fasci (the universal sign of fascism) are everywhere if you look. They're on the back of a dime, on the walls of congress and here. WHY? I decided to find the real meaning behind it and found it terrifying. I hope you look into it for yourself and pass on what you learn. Etymology The term fascismo is derived from the Italian word fascio, which means "bundle" or group, and from the Latin word fasces. The fasces, which consisted of a bundle of rods that were tied around an axe, was an ancient Roman symbol of the authority of the civic magistrate. They were carried by his lictors and could be used for corporal and capital punishment at his command. The word fascismo also relates to political organizations in Italy known as fasci, groups similar to guilds or syndicates. The symbolism of the fasces suggested strength through unity: a single rod is easily broken, while the bundle is difficult to break. Similar symbols were developed by different fascist movements. For example the Falange symbol is a bunch of arrows joined together by a yoke.